Supreme Court quashed the Centre's 2021 Office Memorandum (OM) on ex post facto environmental clearance
GK and monthly revision
The middle path | Explaining Supreme Court’s latest verdict on post facto environmental clearances
The Supreme Court struck down the Centre's 2021 Office Memorandum allowing ex post facto environmental clearances, ruling that any future amnesty under the Environment (Protection) Act must come through a statutory notification, not an administrative order, and be limited to projects of supervening public interest under the EIA framework. This judgment reinforces the principle that environmental governance cannot bypass legislative scrutiny via executive fiat. It clarifies the distinction between statutory rule-making and administrative instructions, strengthening environmental jurisprudence. Highly relevant for polity, environment, and governance sections across competitive exams.
Source: The Hindu. This summary and analysis are AI-written from that report and are not individually fact-checked — confirm names, dates and figures with the source before you rely on them.
Revision structure
Monthly events and exam calendar context
Static GK and one-liner notes
Quiz and mock-test revision path
Key points
Exam-ready takeaways
Ruling: Any future amnesty under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 must be via statutory notification, not administrative order
Amnesty confined to projects of 'supervening public interest' within the EIA Notification, 2006 framework
Judgment reinforces separation of powers — executive cannot create amnesty schemes bypassing legislative process
Strengthens environmental governance by mandating parliamentary oversight for post-facto regularization
How to study
Turn news into exam marks
Revise monthly events by exam family instead of reading random updates.
Pair one-liners with mock tests so mistakes become the next revision list.
Note which exams each story matters for, and revise it again in the week before that exam.