Justice Yashwant Varma was a judge of the Allahabad High Court
GK and monthly revision
Justice Yashwant Varma inquiry: What the panel found and what happens next? | Explained
An inquiry panel investigated Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court over alleged judicial misconduct. The government maintains that removal proceedings initiated before his resignation can continue under constitutional provisions. This case tests the interpretation of Article 217(1)(b) and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 regarding post-resignation accountability of judges. The outcome will set a precedent for judicial accountability and executive-judiciary relations.
Source: The Hindu. This summary and analysis are AI-written from that report and are not individually fact-checked — confirm names, dates and figures with the source before you rely on them.
Revision structure
Monthly events and exam calendar context
Static GK and one-liner notes
Quiz and mock-test revision path
Key points
Exam-ready takeaways
An inquiry panel was constituted to investigate allegations of judicial misconduct
Justice Varma resigned before the inquiry concluded
Government argues removal proceedings can continue as they started before resignation
Case involves interpretation of Article 217(1)(b) and Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
How to study
Turn news into exam marks
Revise monthly events by exam family instead of reading random updates.
Pair one-liners with mock tests so mistakes become the next revision list.
Note which exams each story matters for, and revise it again in the week before that exam.